Burp Scanner
Burp Suite’s web vulnerability scanner
Product comparison
What’s the difference between Pro and Enterprise Edition?
Downloads
Download the latest version of Burp Suite.
In this section, we explain:
If you’re familiar with the basic concepts behind SQLi vulnerabilities and want to practice exploiting them on some realistic, deliberately vulnerable targets, you can access labs in this topic from the link below.
SQL injection (SQLi) is a web security vulnerability that allows an attacker to interfere with the queries that an application makes to its database. This can allow an attacker to view data that they are not normally able to retrieve. This might include data that belongs to other users, or any other data that the application can access. In many cases, an attacker can modify or delete this data, causing persistent changes to the application’s content or behavior.
In some situations, an attacker can escalate a SQL injection attack to compromise the underlying server or other back-end infrastructure. It can also enable them to perform denial-of-service attacks.
A successful SQL injection attack can result in unauthorized access to sensitive data, such as:
SQL injection attacks have been used in many high-profile data breaches over the years. These have caused reputational damage and regulatory fines. In some cases, an attacker can obtain a persistent backdoor into an organization’s systems, leading to a long-term compromise that can go unnoticed for an extended period.
You can detect SQL injection manually using a systematic set of tests against every entry point in the application. To do this, you would typically submit:
Alternatively, you can find the majority of SQL injection vulnerabilities quickly and reliably using Burp Scanner.
Most SQL injection vulnerabilities occur within the WHERE
clause of a SELECT
query. Most experienced testers are familiar with this type of SQL injection.
However, SQL injection vulnerabilities can occur at any location within the query, and within different query types. Some other common locations where SQL injection arises are:
There are lots of SQL injection vulnerabilities, attacks, and techniques, that occur in different situations. Some common SQL injection examples include:
Imagine a shopping application that displays products in different categories. When the user clicks on the Gifts category, their browser requests the URL:
This causes the application to make a SQL query to retrieve details of the relevant products from the database:
This SQL query asks the database to return:
The restriction released = 1
is being used to hide products that are not released. We could assume for unreleased products, released = 0
.
The application doesn’t implement any defenses against SQL injection attacks. This means an attacker can construct the following attack, for example:
This results in the SQL query:
Crucially, note that --
is a comment indicator in SQL. This means that the rest of the query is interpreted as a comment, effectively removing it. In this example, this means the query no longer includes AND released = 1
. As a result, all products are displayed, including those that are not yet released.
You can use a similar attack to cause the application to display all the products in any category, including categories that they don’t know about:
This results in the SQL query:
The modified query returns all items where either the category
is Gifts
, or 1
is equal to 1
. As 1=1
is always true, the query returns all items.
Take care when injecting the condition OR 1=1
into a SQL query. Even if it appears to be harmless in the context you’re injecting into, it’s common for applications to use data from a single request in multiple different queries. If your condition reaches an UPDATE
or DELETE
statement, for example, it can result in an accidental loss of data.
Imagine an application that lets users log in with a username and password. If a user submits the username wiener
and the password bluecheese
, the application checks the credentials by performing the following SQL query:
If the query returns the details of a user, then the login is successful. Otherwise, it is rejected.
In this case, an attacker can log in as any user without the need for a password. They can do this using the SQL comment sequence --
to remove the password check from the WHERE
clause of the query. For example, submitting the username administrator'--
and a blank password results in the following query:
This query returns the user whose username
is administrator
and successfully logs the attacker in as that user.
In cases where the application responds with the results of a SQL query, an attacker can use a SQL injection vulnerability to retrieve data from other tables within the database. You can use the UNION
keyword to execute an additional SELECT
query and append the results to the original query.
For example, if an application executes the following query containing the user input Gifts
:
An attacker can submit the input:
This causes the application to return all usernames and passwords along with the names and descriptions of products.
Many instances of SQL injection are blind vulnerabilities. This means that the application does not return the results of the SQL query or the details of any database errors within its responses. Blind vulnerabilities can still be exploited to access unauthorized data, but the techniques involved are generally more complicated and difficult to perform.
The following techniques can be used to exploit blind SQL injection vulnerabilities, depending on the nature of the vulnerability and the database involved:
First-order SQL injection occurs when the application processes user input from an HTTP request and incorporates the input into a SQL query in an unsafe way.
Second-order SQL injection occurs when the application takes user input from an HTTP request and stores it for future use. This is usually done by placing the input into a database, but no vulnerability occurs at the point where the data is stored. Later, when handling a different HTTP request, the application retrieves the stored data and incorporates it into a SQL query in an unsafe way. For this reason, second-order SQL injection is also known as stored SQL injection.
Second-order SQL injection often occurs in situations where developers are aware of SQL injection vulnerabilities, and so safely handle the initial placement of the input into the database. When the data is later processed, it is deemed to be safe, since it was previously placed into the database safely. At this point, the data is handled in an unsafe way, because the developer wrongly deems it to be trusted.
Some core features of the SQL language are implemented in the same way across popular database platforms, and so many ways of detecting and exploiting SQL injection vulnerabilities work identically on different types of database.
However, there are also many differences between common databases. These mean that some techniques for detecting and exploiting SQL injection work differently on different platforms. For example:
After you identify a SQL injection vulnerability, it’s often useful to obtain information about the database. This information can help you to exploit the vulnerability.
You can query the version details for the database. Different methods work for different database types. This means that if you find a particular method that works, you can infer the database type. For example, on Oracle you can execute:
You can also identify what database tables exist, and the columns they contain. For example, on most databases you can execute the following query to list the tables:
In the previous labs, you used the query string to inject your malicious SQL payload. However, you can perform SQL injection attacks using any controllable input that is processed as a SQL query by the application. For example, some websites take input in JSON or XML format and use this to query the database.
These different formats may provide different ways for you to obfuscate attacks that are otherwise blocked due to WAFs and other defense mechanisms. Weak implementations often look for common SQL injection keywords within the request, so you may be able to bypass these filters by encoding or escaping characters in the prohibited keywords. For example, the following XML-based SQL injection uses an XML escape sequence to encode the S
character in SELECT
:
This will be decoded server-side before being passed to the SQL interpreter.
You can prevent most instances of SQL injection using parameterized queries instead of string concatenation within the query. These parameterized queries are also know as “prepared statements”.
The following code is vulnerable to SQL injection because the user input is concatenated directly into the query:
You can rewrite this code in a way that prevents the user input from interfering with the query structure:
You can use parameterized queries for any situation where untrusted input appears as data within the query, including the WHERE
clause and values in an INSERT
or UPDATE
statement. They can’t be used to handle untrusted input in other parts of the query, such as table or column names, or the ORDER BY
clause. Application functionality that places untrusted data into these parts of the query needs to take a different approach, such as:
For a parameterized query to be effective in preventing SQL injection, the string that is used in the query must always be a hard-coded constant. It must never contain any variable data from any origin. Do not be tempted to decide case-by-case whether an item of data is trusted, and continue using string concatenation within the query for cases that are considered safe. It’s easy to make mistakes about the possible origin of data, or for changes in other code to taint trusted data.
Practise exploiting vulnerabilities on realistic targets.
Record your progression from Apprentice to Expert.
See where you rank in our Hall of Fame.
Already got an account? Login here
Want to track your progress and have a more personalized learning experience? (It’s free!)
Burp Suite
Vulnerabilities
Customers
Company
Insights
© 2024 PortSwigger Ltd.
