Catch up on stories from the past week (and beyond) at the Slashdot story archive
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
So will the water literally become shittier?
I heard it’s already quite crappy:
https://www.theguardian.com/en… [theguardian.com]
https://news.yahoo.com/surfers… [yahoo.com]
https://www.politico.eu/articl… [politico.eu]
After resorting to dumping raw sewage into the Baltic sea this looks like a new low for the UK.
UK dumping raw sewage into Baltic sea? Sounds strange.
UK dumping raw sewage into Baltic sea? Sounds strange.
Well, would you rather dump it in the sea next to you or the one next to Russia (and some other minor nations of no import – I mean they are all “European” whatever that means)? This would be absolutely the kind of policy the current UK government would celebrate. The subcontractors, however, are probably not even getting out into the North Sea and are likely charging for the full distance whilst dumping it all in the Thames estuary, so don’t worry about this my Polish and Scandinavian friends. There’s no w
After resorting to dumping raw sewage into the Baltic sea this looks like a new low for the UK.
After resorting to dumping raw sewage into the Baltic sea this looks like a new low for the UK.
I can personally remember when the city of Blackpool dumped its raw sewage into the Irish Sea on every high tide, relying on the city’s 20-foot tide to carry the stuff away.
So when is the next Big Stink scheduled for?
So when is the next Big Stink scheduled for?
So when is the next Big Stink scheduled for?
There have been lots of reports recently of swimming competitions in the sea where everybody got sick, so I suspect the only reason you don’t realize it’s happening now is that you are used to the smell.
“Biologically dead” doesn’t automatically mean “polluted”. The western suburbs of Broward County, Florida *exist* as dry land (where the houses are) because developers built neighborhood-scale limestone strip mines, crushed & dumped it nearby to add 5-15 feet of elevation to the surrounding future neighborhood, then allowed the lakes to fill up with rainwater & create brand new high-value waterfront property.
The most desirable lakes (for homeowners & property values) are 50+ feet deep, have stee
I understand conservatives around the world are always hell-bent on reducing public expenditure (when they’re honest politicians and not trying to line their pockets that is).
But one thing puzzles me: when funding is cut to important things like air or water quality monitoring, oil companies are allowed to do fracking near water tables and make people sick, chemical companies are allowed to skimp on safety checks, NOAA’s budget is reduced to uselessness and can’t monitor life-threatening weather events or – longer term – research budgets on clean power are cut while muderous military spending are increased, it doesn’t take a genius to understand that whoever allows these things to happen hurts their fellow man.
And what I don’t understand is this: how does one in charge live with themselves when the hurt they cause is VERY clearly disproportionate with the savings they seek to achieve?
I have no great faith in anybody who choses politics as a career, because politicians have proven time and time again how unprincipled they can be. But I refuse to believe that a vast majority of those human beings can be psychopathic enough to think hurting a lot people is okay to save a little money. And yet they seem to be…
Well, you have to understand three things about the UK to understand this:
1) They have a first past the post system and such mostly leads to more extreme opinions winning in candidate selection “as you are preaching to the choir”. In the case of UK this is made worse by the fact that the selection process is done by party members that are a very small % of the total population.
2) The brainwashing power of the press is higher in UK than in many other places due to education and cultural factors. A lot of people actually still buy newspapers there as example. Combine that with the fact that almost all news papers and other media in UK is very partisan and you get populations that do not vote on issues or record, but instead based on the outrage stroked by the press.
3) The richer parts of the society are like a closed club, with donations going to parties and individual MPs and returned directly in public contracts, legislation to benefit the donor and such. This one is mostly the Tories, Labor has their problems due to unions having too high say and such, but overall not so bad and the other parties in general suffer a lot less of this as they have a lot less power to sell..
This basically leads to psychopaths raising to the top in Conservatives (and impractical ideologues in Labor). The other parties need to usually actually try to elect someone smart to lead and as candidates, just to survive in a first past the post.
I agree for the most part, with the exception of the media. While newspapers in the UK are *highly* partisan, TV news is much less partisan than most places thanks to the BBC. While the BBC is far from perfectly unbiased (it’s got somewhat of a right lean just now), the nature of its funding does mean that news tends to be much closer to centre than most places.
While newspapers in the UK are *highly* partisan,
While newspapers in the UK are *highly* partisan,
There is no pretense in the UK that the newspapers are “Fair and Balanced”.
BBC News leans right? How?
Combine that with the fact that almost all news papers and other media in UK is very partisan
Specifically the right wing press. There is one explicitly partisan left wing newspaper (the Guardian) and that is objectively a lot less bad. By way of example, they recently had an opinion piece by a former Tory minister (Justine Greening), and that is not wildly unusual.
This basically leads to psychopaths raising to the top in Conservatives (and impractical ideologues in Labor)
I’d say Truss was an impractical id
Smoke and mirrors, as soon as a left-wing politician (Corbyn) got to lead the Labour party The Guardian’s knives came out. They’re trying to lick Starmer’s arse but he’s really slippery.
Starmer is as sociopath as the rest of them, no concern for human rights, no concern for the environment, not interested in helping the poorest in society if it means spending any money at all.
Conservatives are hell bent on maximising short term profits for their friends, not on running the country in the most efficient way possible. A “traditional” conservative would support things like water/air quality monitoring, since they maintain the traditional status quo – that is, they conserve life the same as it always has been (the root of the word conservative).
Conservatives are hell bent on maximising short term profits for their friends,
Conservatives are hell bent on maximising short term profits for their friends,
Make hay while the sun shines. The Tories know they are going to be wiped out in the next election. The only question is whether they will still be the opposition party, or will be relegated to being the third largest.
Recent by-elections went very badly for the Tories.
They also tend to believe they’re being persecuted – I think this is because they’re busy trying to exploit everyone around them and so believe everyone else is the same way.
As I get older, I’m starting to think they SHOULD be persecuted. They’re simply not good for a highly interconnected and fragile civilization.
I’m not saying we need to round them up and kill them… just round them up and transport them somewhere they can only hurt each other.
>Last time we tried that it caused Australia
Keep in mind, that was ‘ship the criminals there’ and not ‘ship the assholes there’. A fine line in many cases, but an important one.
Also, we could re-use Australia, maybe choose the least desired quarter and relocate the current inhabitants with a payout.
But I refuse to believe that a vast majority of those human beings can be psychopathic enough to think hurting a lot people is okay to save a little money. And yet they seem to be…
But I refuse to believe that a vast majority of those human beings can be psychopathic enough to think hurting a lot people is okay to save a little money. And yet they seem to be…
Have you read any Ayn Rand? You should at a minimum read the Fountain head courtroom scene. The intellectuals who are pushing the conservative agenda are basically fervent believers in that sort of thing. It is ideologically driven behaviour, and Ayn Rand is the ideology. These people genuinely believe this is how society works and that they are doing divine work to return things to the ‘natural’ order.
House builders donated £50 million to the Tory Party, and this is their return on that investment.
And what I don’t understand is this: how does one in charge live with themselves when the hurt they cause is VERY clearly disproportionate with the savings they seek to achieve?
When greed is the goal, who your hurt doesn’t really matter.
Your river got polluted because I cut EPA funding> Why do you live so close to the river> Do you see me living there?
You can’t breathe the air in the city? Why don’t you have a countryside manor?
Etc. etc. etc.
You have to remember the conservative side generally falls i
Just because they cannot force the UK water industry to fix their consistent negligence
They can, they just don’t want to. They could have going-bankrupt levels of fines, and/or criminal negligence for executives.
It really is down to money. If those hundreds of billions given to shareholders had been spent on the water network, we wouldn’t have these problems at all.
The basic issue is that we have a combined waste water system, so household waste water and rainwater end up in the same pipes. If they were separate then we could mostly dump the rainwater because it’s not contaminated and would have ended up in rivers anyway. Also, the system was mostly built in the Victorian era, but even long after that we are still
Yes the combined system isn’t ideal. Even with that though it shouldn’t be nearly as bad as it. The main problem is it’s more profitable to take the fines than build and maintain infrastructure.
Combined systems should only overflow during exceptional peaks, at which point the pipes ought to have been flushed into the treatment plant by the heavy rain up to the point of the overflow. Trouble is the water companies have been keeping infrastructure at marginal levels, at which point they overflow worth pipes n
Well, yes, different governments “diverge” – it’s what they do. That doesn’t automatically mean that one choice is better than the other.
If England were full of exotic (to the readers of
That doesn’t automatically mean that one choice is better than the other.
It does when they’ve been consistently failing to hit the current standards.
If England were full of exotic (to the readers of
Oh I see you’re making shit up and attacking that to sound more right. Except you’re wrong on all counts.
On the bright side the government can no longer blame the EU for its failings. The negative side the UK has been run by the same party too long and really needs a different set of clowns to have a go.
On the bright side the government can no longer blame the EU for its failings. The negative side the UK has been run by the same party too long and really needs a different set of clowns to have a go.
On the bright side the government can no longer blame the EU for its failings. The negative side the UK has been run by the same party too long and really needs a different set of clowns to have a go.
I wish I was as optimistic about this as you are. The EU is still the UK’s closest neighbour and trading partner, and will continue to be a target for blame as long as it exists.
Although I have to laugh at how things like the channel migrant crisis have gotten the Tory party tied up in knots. Even the most rabid right wing knob on the street can understand that the EU doesn’t have an obligation to stop migrants who want to leave the EU and become the UK’s problem (indeed, dumping migrants on other countries
I wish I was as optimistic about this as you are. The EU is still the UK’s closest neighbour and trading partner, and will continue to be a target for blame as long as it exists.
I wish I was as optimistic about this as you are. The EU is still the UK’s closest neighbour and trading partner, and will continue to be a target for blame as long as it exists.
The EU has always been an easy scapegoat for some political groups in the UK. After all it is far easier to blame foreigners for everything that admit that problems may have been caused by your own government. With Brexit a reality, it exposes how much denialism still exists. For example, before Brexit a large majority of agricultural work was done by foreign labor. The delusion was that if not for Freedom of movement all those jobs would magically be filled by Britons. The reality is that most people in general do not want to work long hours in all weather conditions for little pay. Thus farms had to cut back on production or see crops rot in the fields due to lack of workers. But somehow that is still the fault of the EU that EU workers no longer want to deal with the complications of work visas when they can work elsewhere.
Only pumping raw sewage into rivers, lakes and ocean, hardly 400.000 times per year.
Only +1000 times per day, so small wonder they want to stop monitoring.
It’s over.
They gave up.
Wealthy people pushed Brexit so that this kind of thing could be done. Profit for a small number of people at the expense of the country at large. EU regulations tended to make this more difficult.
> Northern Ireland) will no-doubt make their own decisions on the matter
ROFL. Really?
This wasn’t so much about true pollution, just some rules which made nitrogen load from new homes need to be compensated by builders. Cause somehow it’s a problem when it’s a new home, but it’s okay when you live with your parents.
It’s one of the death by a thousand cut ways to push up home prizes, which is extremely destabilising in a society with increasing levels of single occupant homes and continuing massive immigration.
There may be more comments in this discussion. Without JavaScript enabled, you might want to turn on Classic Discussion System in your preferences instead.
Google Can Turn ANC Earbuds Into a Heart Rate Monitor With No Extra Hardware
New Agreement Enables US Launches From Australian Spaceports
“Indecision is the basis of flexibility” — button at a Science Fiction convention.